15.4.25

Women in History: Royal Rivals Catherine De Medici and Diane De Poitiers

 

Catherine de Medici (above) and Diane de Poitiers (below); Henri II's wife and mistress. Images: Wikipedia. Public Domain.
Catherine de Medici (above) and Diane de Poitiers (below); Henri II's wife and mistress. Images: Wikipedia. Public Domain.
Catherine de Medici (above) and Diane de Poitiers (below); King Henri II of France's wife and mistress.
Images: Wikipedia. Public Domain.

King Henri II's Wife and Mistress

During the 16th century, King Henri II of France's wife Catherine de Medici and his mistress Diane de Poitiers were rivals. Catherine was considered a formidable foe in her later life as the “serpent queen,” but she found herself ill-equipped to compete with Diane during her marriage.

Courtiers and rulers across Europe regarded Diane as the unofficial queen of France because she had Henri's love, lust and favour. He depended on her counsel and companionship. Catherine was disregarded for twenty-six years, but in the summer of 1559, she took her revenge on Diane—a moment that she might have dreamed about.


Early Similarities Between Diane de Poitiers and Catherine de Medici

Catherine de Medici was born in April 1519 in the Republic of Florence. She was a member of the ruling Medici dynasty; her father was Lorenzo de Medici, Count of Urbino, and Catherine's French mother was named Madeleine. By the time Catherine was one month old, both her parents were dead. She was raised by her paternal grandmother and aunt Alfonsina d'Orsini and Clarice de Medici.

Diane de Poitiers was an aristocrat born to Jean de Poitiers and his wife Jeanne in September 1499 or January 1500 at the Chateau du Saint-Vallier in southeast France.

Her mother passed away in 1506, and Diane was placed in the household of Princess Anne of France (the eldest daughter of King Louis XI; she was also known as Anne de Beaujeu and "Madame la Grande"). Diane was well educated. She learned finance, etiquette, languages, music, riding, hunting and swimming.

Diane and Catherine shared the character traits of confidence, intelligence and dynamism.


Lady-in-Waiting to Three French Queens

Princess Anne arranged for fifteen-year-old Diane de Poitiers to marry Louis de Brézé, Comte de Maulevrier, Seigneur d'Anet. Royal courtier Louis was thirty-nine years her senior.

Diane was appointed as a lady-in-waiting to King François I’s mother, Louise of Savoy and then to François’ queens Claude and Eleanore of Austria. Henri, Duc d'Orléans, later King Henri II (1519-1559) was Francois and Claude’s second son.

Diane gave birth to two daughters, Françoise in 1518 and Louise in 1521. In 1531, Louis died, and Diane went to the law courts to secure his estate rather than allowing it to pass to a male relative. She became financially independent, and that was highly unusual at the time.

Diane first met Henri, Duc d'Orléans, when he was a child, and they had always got on well. Rumours surfaced that the adolescent Henri was in love with the beautiful widow Diane, but Henri was destined to marry another woman, Diane's cousin Catherine de Medici.


Diane Outshone The Royal Bride

Henri's dynastic match to Catherine de Medici, when they were both fourteen years old, was an extravagant event held in Marseilles, France, on 28th October 1533. Pope Clement VII officiated.

To ensure that the teenagers consummated the union on the wedding night, King François remained in the bedchamber until he was sure the deed had been done and that "each had shown valour in the joust." Not at all awkward!

Catherine barely saw Henri during the first year of their marriage. Diane de Poitiers became Henri's mistress in 1534, and she was officially termed as such from 1538.

At court, the more experienced Diane outshone the new Duchesse d'Orléans without too much effort. She had Henri's affection, and was clever, cultured and interesting. Henri blatantly ignored Catherine in public while caressing his mistress. When jousting, he wore Diane's colours.


From Dauphin and Dauphine To France's Monarchs

Henri's older brother Francois died from a post-tennis match fever in 1536, and as it was unexpected, speculation of foul play mounted. Catherine was one of several people accused of poisoning him. Henri was elevated to Dauphin or heir to the French throne, and Catherine was accordingly promoted to Dauphine.

Diane advised Henri to have children with his wife to secure the succession. He was slow to do so. Between 1544 and 1556, Catherine bore ten children. Henri placed Diane de Poitiers in charge of the royal children's upbringing. Diane secured her daughter Françoise's appointment as Premiere Dame D'honneur (head lady-in-waiting) to Catherine de Medici.

Diane was by Henri's side when he was proclaimed King Henri II in March 1547. He relied on her wisdom and not Catherine's throughout his reign. Official documents were signed HenriDiane, and Diane was acclaimed as the most powerful woman in France. She was cultivated by diplomats and royalty. Catherine was queen in name only; whenever she acted as regent for Henri, she had very limited powers and no political influence.


Chateau de Chenonceau 

Henri gave Diane the early Renaissance Château de Chenonceau in the Loire Valley. This was a property that Henri knew Catherine desired for herself. He paid for Diane's Château d'Anet to be rebuilt on the site of her late husband's property. It was filled with commissions from her artistic protégés.

Diane received the titles Duchesse de Valentinois in 1548 and Duchesse d'Étampes in 1553, and the king awarded custody of the French crown jewels to her.

On 10th July 1559, Diane's time as de facto queen of France came to an abrupt halt when Henri died from sepsis after he sustained a jousting injury.


Catherine Finally Claims Power Over Diane de Poitiers

Catherine leapt into action; she was the mother of the new king, and she intended to wield her influence. Diane was banished from court and she was ordered to return the crown jewels and to give up the Château de Chenonceau in exchange for the slightly less grand Château de Chaumont, also in the Loire Valley.

Catherine was labelled the "Serpent Queen." She saw three of her sons reign over France, she engineered strategic marriages for her family members, and it's widely accepted that she was complicit in the 1572 St. Bartholomew's Massacre in which thousands of Huguenot protestants were butchered for their faith. Catherine de Medici dominated the French court until her death on 5th January 1589.

Diane's Grave Desecrated During the French Revolution

In contrast, after a brief residence at the Château de Chaumont, Diane retired to her property in Anet. She lived quietly, and she caused the royal family no problems. One day, Diane fell when out riding, and ill health dominated her life until she died on 25th April 1566.

A chapel was constructed on the grounds of Château d'Anet, and Diane was laid to rest there. During the French Revolution, her grave was desecrated, and her remains were thrown into a mass grave. In 2009, her bones were identified, and they were restored to their original grave in Anet.


Sources



11.4.25

France and Germany's Dispute: Alsace-Lorraine or Elsass Lothringen?

Traditional costumes for Alsace. Image: Wikipedia. Public Domain.
Traditional Alsation costumes. Image: Wikipedia. Public Domain.


Where Was Alsace-Lorraine or Elsass-Lothringen?

Alsace-Lorraine covered just over five thousand square miles in northeast France. It fell under German control at several points during its history, most notably as the Reichsland (Imperial Territory) Elsass-Lothringen after the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1871.

The iron-rich land situated on the French-German border featured countless steel and iron works, but this financial and industrial asset was apparently never a factor in the Germans' insistence that Alsace-Lorraine belonged to them.

Alsace and Lorraine were part of the "Father of Europe" Emperor Charlemagne's Frankish Empire, and in 843 A.D., his grandson Emperor Lothair I was proclaimed the ruler of Middle Francia. This became better known as Lotharingia and later as Lorraine. Alsace lay to Lorraine's east and southeast.

On 8 August 870, Charles the Bald in West Francia (France) and his half-brother Louis the German in East Francia (Germany) split their recently deceased nephew Lothair I's territory between them. The Treaty of Meerson formally recognised Louis the German as the ruler of the land to the east of the Jura Mountains, the Moselle and Meuse valleys.

In 962, West and East Francia formed part of Emperor Otto I's Holy Roman Empire.

1648: The Peace of Westphalia

German emperors reigned until 1469, when Upper Alsace was awarded, with limited powers, to Charles of Burgundy. He was the subordinate of the German emperor in Lower Alsace, and all taxes from Upper Alsace were paid into Lower Alsace's coffers.

In 1476, Lorraine gained independence from France, and it became a duchy. In 1477, Upper Alsace passed to the House of Habsburg.

The Thirty Years War (1618-1648) signalled another change. At the war's conclusion, the Peace Treaty of Westphalia was drawn up, and the Alsace-Lorraine region was officially awarded to France because its army had seized most of the territory in battle.

Over the next decade, much of Lorraine was restored to the duchy's last ruler Charles IV, as confirmed in the Treaty of Pyrenees. Charles' powers were not reinstated to their previous level. The French monarch claimed supremacy over him.

Two hundred years of French rule under a succession of monarchs and the Bonapartes' followed.

The Franco-Prussian War: The Loss of Alsace-Lorraine

By 1870, Emperor Napoleon III, Napoleon I's nephew, through his brother Louis, ruled in France. He was a successful figure for over twenty years, but he fell from power with a deft blow from the Prussians.

The Franco-Prussian War was an escalation of a dispute about who should succeed to the Spanish throne. Enmity between France and Germany was used by the Prussian Minister-President Otto von Bismarck as a reason to wage war. There was an ulterior motive: By giving the German states a common enemy, he hoped to finally realise his vision of German unification.

The Prussians were victorious, and the French were demoralised. Napoleon III was taken prisoner and deposed. On 18th January 1871, in the Hall of Mirrors in Paris' Palace of Versailles, King Wilhelm I of Prussia announced the establishment of the German Empire and his elevation from king to emperor (kaiser). Napoleon III was allowed to travel to exile in England. He died on 9th January 1873 in Chislehurst, then in Kent, and today in Greater London.

The new German Empire claimed Alsace-Lorraine in the Treaty of Frankfurt to give the German army more defensive land on the border. The French lost the revenue derived from the region's iron and steel.

Reichsland Elsass-Lothringen

Alsace-Lorraine was renamed Reichsland Elsass-Lothringen (reichsland: imperial state). The population was predominantly French, and they remained loyal to France. A mass emigration took place. The French that remained in the reichsland harboured a considerable grudge against the Germans.

This weakened as the French Catholic Church and French Republic governments made announcements and changes that were deemed anticlerical and unpopular. A sizeable percentage of the people in Elsass-Lothringen shifted their allegiance to the Germans, and in 1902 Elsass-Lothringen was authorised to self-govern.

In 1911, Elsass-Lothringen was given its own constitution.

A German influence prevailed. Alsatian, a heavily German dialect, was (and remains) the common language; traditional Alsatian costumes were adopted, and German cuisine became popular. Three-quarters of the reichsland's inhabitants were fluent in German when World War One was declared.

The 20th Century for Alsace-Lorraine

After the bloodshed of the First World War, Alsace-Lorraine was again given to the French. In a reversal of the 1871 sentiments, the pro-German population preferred self-government under the Germans to being a small and governed region of France.

Throughout the 1920s, the Alsations mounted unsuccessful campaigns to regain their self-government. The French government refused to buckle, and the people's hunger for autonomy faded as the years passed.

During the Second World War, Alsace-Lorraine fell into German hands, and it was known as Gau-Baden Elsass. After the war, the French controlled Alsace-Lorraine.

The cities of Alsace and Lorraine remain, and today, the old Alsace-Lorraine lies in the départements of Moselle, Haut-Rhin and Bas-Rhin in the Grand Est region of France.

French and German are taught in the area's schools, and the influences, dialects and habits from both countries are a part of everyday life.

Sources

10.4.25

Interesting History: Julius Caesar Was Kidnapped By Pirates

Gaius Julius Caesar was kidnapped by pirates, they lived to regret their actions. Image: Wikipedia. Public Domain.
Gaius Julius Caesar was kidnapped by pirates. They lived to regret their actions. 
Image: Wikipedia. Public Domain.


Gaius Julius Caesar of the Roman Republic

When Julius Caesar is mentioned, thoughts of "Beware the ides of March," "Et tu, Brute" and his liaison with Cleopatra might spring to mind. However, there was an odd event when he was in his twenties that he probably hoped would be conveniently forgotten, and yet it's too tempting not to record it for new eyes to read.

Gaius Julius Caesar of the Julia gens or dynasty was born on 12 July 100 B.C. in Rome to his father of the same name and mother, Aurelia. He could trace his lineage back to the goddess Venus and was an Alban.

Albans were a community that had settled in the ancient Alba Longa, a Latin city to the southeast of Rome, before their arrival in Rome itself. The Julia gens held patrician status and were deemed important enough to the Roman Republic that they enjoyed privileges and powers over the rest of the population. At age 16, Julius Caesar became the head of the family when his father died.


Kidnapped by Cilician Pirates

When a 25-year-old Julius Caesar, a few friends and servants set sail to the island of Rhodes so that he could study, little did any of the party realise that Caesar would be kidnapped. Although they would have known about the bloodthirsty Cilician pirates who patrolled the Mediterranean and Aegean Seas, no one was sufficiently deterred from making the journey.

The Cilician pirates decided to ransom him for 20 talents. A talent was the heaviest ancient unit of weight, and in Rome, it was 32.3 kg; in Attica (Greece), one talent of silver had a weight of 26 kg. By either measurement, mighty Caesar was not impressed. He told them that they obviously didn't know how great the man they'd kidnapped was, and he instructed his captors to demand 50 talents.

The biographer Plutarch (120–46 BC) wrote of the incident and recorded that Caesar even offered to pay the 50 talents himself. Gaius Julius Caesar claimed to be worth far more than 20 talents, and the pirates were happy to believe him.

Caesar Was a Demanding Hostage

Any hopes that Julius Caesar would be compliant were dashed as the hostage took control of the situation. According to him, he was the superior man, and he refused to be commanded. He issued orders to the pirates, including that they must be silent when he wished to sleep, and he joined in the games they played, although uninvited.

To the pirates' consternation, they were given readings of the speeches and poems that he worked on in captivity. When they offered their less-than-favourable opinions of Julius Caesar's musings, he denounced them as too ill-bred and savage to understand.

He lamented that they were incapable of appreciating his work. Of course, it couldn't possibly have been that he was boring or annoying them to distraction.

Mighty Caesar's Revenge

Julius Caesar apparently joked with his captors that when he was finally released, he would gather a fleet of ships, find the guilty and have them killed for kidnapping him. Plutarch claimed that everyone found his joke funny because, at this time, the Roman Republic did not halt or punish the Cilician pirates' activities because they operated the slave trade, which provided the Roman powers with useful servants.

After 38 days spent not enjoying the hospitality of the pirates any more than they did his company, the ransom of 50 talents arrived from Miletus. The transaction complete, Julius Caesar was free to continue with his study plans.

He decided that a far more satisfactory course of action was to make his joke of execution a reality in a rare punishment for pirates. He drew together sailors and troops for a naval attack on Rhodes to remind his captors that he was the powerful Julius Caesar and they were mere ruffians.

The pirates were still on Rhodes when Caesar returned. He seized their money and treasures, and they were arrested and imprisoned in Pergamon (modern-day Bergama, Turkey), but the governor was reluctant to carry out the executions. Caesar took the matter into his own hands and had each one crucified alive after their throats were slit.

Et Tu, Brute?

Caesar's rise to power followed countless military victories, and his adventure with the pirates was probably tactfully forgotten. However, the historians and writers of the day could not fully surrender their memory of the 75 B.C. kidnapping, which is why we know about it today.

Julius Caesar married three times, had two legitimate children and probably another three by his mistresses, the most famous being Cleopatra.

In 49 B.C., he defeated his rival and former ally in the political body the First Triumvirate, Pompey the Great. This same year, he crossed the Rubicon River, hence the saying, to invade Rome against his senate's guidance.

His senators did not appreciate his defiance, and a four-year-long civil war ensued. During his years as ruler, the Julian Calendar was created, and his social and land ownership reforms were received positively by the public, but they angered the important families and senators of the empire.

Although the war ended in 45 B.C. with a victory for Caesar, his euphoria was short-lived. He was assassinated on the 15th of March (the Ides of March) in 44 B.C. by disaffected senators.

He was better able to combat bloodthirsty pirates than his own senators.

Historical Fact: Eccentric Queen Christina of Sweden Abdicated Aged 27

 

Queen Christina of Sweden. Image: Wikipedia. Public Domain.Queen Christina of Sweden. Image: Wikipedia. Public Domain.

Queen Christina of Sweden. Image: Wikipedia. Public Domain.

Christina, Child Queen of Sweden

Born on the 18th December 1626 at Tre Kronor Castle in Stockholm, Christina was the last child of the Royal House of Vasa’s King Gustaf II Adolf of Sweden and his wife Maria Eleanora of Brandenburg. Her father was relieved to be a parent again; the couple had lost a son and two daughters in infancy, but her mother lamented that the hairy crying baby she had produced was not male.

Gustaf II Adolf was killed in battle before Christina reached six years old, and as his only surviving heir, the throne of Sweden fell to her. She was not of an age to rule alone, so the influential Lord High Chancellor Axel Oxenstierna and four other ministers ruled in her name until adulthood. Christina was allowed to join the council meetings from the age of 14.

Never an affectionate mother, Maria Eleanora suffered from mental health issues, and as a widow, she was sent to the remote Gripsholm Castle. Princess Katerina of Sweden, Countess Palatine of Zweibrucken-Kleeburg raised Christina.

Philosopher Rene Descartes

Christina was educated as a male which set her above many royal daughters. She was a keen student and quickly grasped politics under Oxenstierna’s guidance. In 1649 she invited philosopher Rene Descartes to Stockholm so that he could teach her philosophy, but she did not appreciate him. Descartes was seen as a trophy by her, and his visit validated her royal status in Europe.

She frequently postponed their philosophy sessions, and when she did grant him an audience, it was before dawn, in flickering candlelight in a room with no fire, and Descartes couldn’t wear a hat in her presence without it being considered an insult. Descartes suffered in the increasing cold and hinted that he would like to go home, but Christina insisted on his remaining in Sweden. He died miserably in Stockholm from a respiratory infection on the 11th February 1650, aged 53.

Queen Christina's Eccentricities 

Queen Christina believed that being female was her great misfortune, perhaps the ultimate tragedy of her life. She often wore men’s clothing, was reluctant to wash, frequently had dirty nails and was not considered a great beauty of the age. Her sense of humour and intelligence were not valued as attributes. Women were supposed to be pretty, not witty, according to 17th-century men.

She spent lavishly and lived in opulence, even as her people starved, thanks to the cost of the ongoing Thirty Years War. She failed to realise that her frivolous behaviour was at odds with many Swedes’ struggle to survive.

She relied heavily on Axel Oxenstierna in the early years of her reign but, in time, regarded him as a threat. Despite her flaws, it was acknowledged that under her influence, Sweden’s trade, arts and science progressed significantly and she became known as the Minerva of the North in European courts.

The Queen of Sweden Quits. Why?

In early 1654, Christina announced to a stunned court that she was ill—it's possible she had suffered a nervous breakdown, but there is no proof, and that ruling Sweden was too much of a strain. She abdicated in favour of her cousin Charles who had previously been refused as a potential husband for her.

In fact, she’d refused to marry anyone, which led to speculation that her reluctance to marry and produce an heir was the true reason for her departure, presumably under growing pressure from her ministers. Her sexuality was questioned, claims of an affair with her lady-in-waiting Ebba Sparre surfaced, and to this day, it’s still disputed where her preferences lay.

Another theory abounded that she intended to publicly convert to Roman Catholicism, which placed her in an untenable position as the head of a devout protestant country. Unofficially, she converted in 1652 and officially in 1655.

Exiled Queen Christina in Rome

Christina brokered an abdication deal. Sweden would pay her a generous allowance wherever she might reside for the rest of her life. Cousin Charles X Gustaf’s coronation and Christina’s exit from her homeland occurred on the same day.

At her abdication ceremony at Uppsala Castle, each item of the Swedish regalia was removed from her piece by piece, but one minister refused to take the crown from her head. Unhesitatingly, she took it off herself. The new king ruled Sweden from the 6th June 1654 until his death in 1660, aged 37. A 71-year-old Axel Oxenstierna died in 1654, still Sweden’s Chancellor.

After an extended stay in Austria, on Christmas Day 1655 she was received in Rome by Pope Alexander VII, who gave her the confirmation name of Alexandra. He was soon disappointed in Christina/Alexandra, who enjoyed his hospitality and the use of the Palazzo Farnese but seemed unwilling or unable to follow her adopted faith’s edicts.

Her recklessness made her notorious. A stranger to frugality, she regularly ran out of funds, petitioned Swedish ministers for allowance increases and even sold some of her jewels.

Royal Prerogative: Murder

Through boredom or a yearning for power, Christina entered into talks about reigning in the Spanish territory of Naples and passing Naples to the French when she died. This plan was abandoned, partly because whilst visiting France for the negotiations, Christina had her advisor and possible lover, the Marchese Gian Rinaldo Monaldeschi, butchered for betraying her, despite there being no proof.

To the consternation and horror of Europe, she used her royal prerogative as the reason for brutally ending his life. Under the weight of disdain, she headed back to Rome, where the Pope was not pleased to see her.

She made a splendid home in the city at the Palazzo Corsini, patronised the arts and somehow managed to win the favour or friendship of four Popes. It was believed in Rome that she took Cardinal Decio Azzolino as her lover.

Christina Returns to Sweden

When news reached her of Charles X Gustaf’s death in 1660, she returned to Sweden, insisting bizarrely that she should rule again rather than Charles’ five-year-old son. She was forced to concede.

She travelled to Sweden again in 1667 and was approached about becoming the queen of Poland as another of her cousins had abdicated there. This did not come to pass, and she happily returned to Rome and Cardinal Azzolino. She invested her time in church politics and became a sponsor of Jewish people, and improved their rights.

She died from pneumonia and an infection in Rome on the 19th April 1689 and was buried in the Papal Crypt in St. Peter’s Basilica, one of only a few women ever to have received this honour. She died before she completed her autobiography. That tome may have answered a few questions that persist about this eccentric woman-queen. 

Sources

9.4.25

Dirty Bertie: The Prince of Wales and the Mordaunt Divorce

 

Edward and Alexandra, Prince and Princess of Wales, later King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra. On the right is Harriet Mordaunt. Images: Wikipedia. Public Domain.
1st Image: Edward and Alexandra, Prince and Princess of Wales, later King Edward VII and Queen Alexandra. 
 2nd Image: Harriet Mordaunt. Images: Wikipedia. Public Domain.

Divorce in Victorian England Meant Ruin

Divorce in an English civil court had been possible since 1858 at the Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes. Until then, divorce had been a matter for the ecclesiastical courts. The cost was exorbitant, and the divorce rate was a few hundred cases per year at most by 1870.

Divorcees were not accepted by polite society. Petitioners and respondents knew unquestionably that royal family members would not grace an event hosted or attended by them. The monarch was the head of the Church of England, which opposed divorce, so it was imperative not to be seen to condone it or tolerate the people connected to it. It was more acceptable among the Victorian elite for an heir and spare to be delivered to the couple before separate private lives were carved out and a public façade maintained for appearance's sake.

Sir Charles Mordaunt Files For Divorce

Sir Charles Mordaunt (1836-1897) was a star of the Prince and Princess of Wales’ Marlborough House Set. He petitioned for a divorce because Harriet (1848-1906), his wife since the 6th of December 1866, had confessed to committing adultery with numerous men including the Prince of Wales.

Bertie or Edward, Prince of Wales (1841-1910) was not named as a co-respondent in the legal papers and no proof was presented of an affair but his involvement in the case was an outrage in itself. Viscount Lowry Cole (1845-1924) and Sir Frederick Johnstone (1841-1913) were named as co-respondents.

Harriet Mordaunt Was Unfaithful

Putting it tactfully Harriet was not the most faithful of wives during her four-year marriage. The crisis came in the summer of 1868 when Charles was in Norway on a fishing trip. Harriet fell pregnant, probably by her lover Viscount Cole. Charles returned home to Walton Hall in Warwickshire several days earlier than planned but he found her alone. A daughter named Violet was born on the 28th of February 1869, and she was said to be premature.

At first, Violet was thought to be blind. Harriet was overwhelmed by the sense that the sight loss was punishment for her affairs and possibly the result of an S.T.I. She confessed. “Charlie, I have deceived you; the child is not yours; it’s Lord Cole’s.” She listed her lovers, “Lord Cole, Sir Frederick Johnstone, the Prince of Wales and others, often and in open day.” Charles found a stack of friendly and unromantic letters from Bertie in her desk drawer.

Violet had an eye infection and her sight returned.

Confrontation at Walton Hall

A few days later when Charles returned home to Walton Hall he flew into a rage when he saw Bertie and Harriet riding around the grounds in a carriage with two ponies that Bertie had given to her as a gift.

Confronted, Bertie denied that he and Harriet were involved in anything more than a platonic friendship. Charles was in no mood to believe him. The prince was shown off his property before Charles forced Harriet to watch him shoot the ponies.

Mordaunt V. Mordaunt, Cole and Johnstone

The hearing that began on the 23rd of February 1870 was to establish if Harriet Mordaunt was mentally incapable of being involved in a divorce case as her family, the Moncrieffe’s, claimed. Harriet was the daughter of Sir Thomas and Lady Louise Moncreiffe, friends and frequent guests of Bertie and his Danish-born wife of seven years, Alexandra (1844-1925). Harriet had known Bertie since childhood and when she was married at eighteen to Member of Parliament Charles Mordaunt, the couple were often in the Wales’ company. Sir Charles was unconvinced that Harriet was suffering from any affliction.

Mordaunt V. Mordaunt, Cole and Johnstone was heard at the public Court for Divorce and Matrimonial Causes. The sensational trial lasted seven days. The press coverage was extensive and the public appetite was insatiable. The court was presided over by James Wilde, Lord Penzance (1816-1899.) A special jury was selected. Dr. Deane Q.C., Mr. Searle and Mr. Archibald acted on Harriet Mordaunt’s behalf. Sir Charles’ legal team was comprised of Dr. Spinks Q.C., Mr. Serjeant Ballantine and Mr. Inderwick.

A First: A Prince of Wales Testifies in Court

Seeing a senior royal in a courtroom was, and still is, a rare and dreaded event. The diminutive and demanding Queen Victoria (1819-1901) must have shuddered when she learned that twenty-eight-year-old Bertie had agreed to participate in a divorce case and that he would appear in person. This marked the first-ever appearance of a Prince of Wales in an open courtroom in history.

Queen Victoria and the Princess of Wales supported Bertie and trusted that he was innocent, although Alix was said to be deeply hurt by the situation. Bertie’s voluntary seven-minute appearance in court on the 23rd of February, 1870, to refute allegations of adultery was thoroughly uncomfortable for the establishment.

A Surprise Verdict: Case Dismissed

Experts concluded that Harriet was suffering from puerperal mania as a result of Violet’s birth. The divorce case was dismissed. It’s highly likely that Prime Minister William Gladstone, Dr. Thomas Harrington Tuke and Bertie’s private secretary Francis Knollys worked behind the scenes to protect the prince from further scandal. Republicanism gained support as the Mordaunt case played out and it added to the displeasure felt by the public about a largely invisible queen who refused to return to public duties.

Republicanism stalled when Bertie almost died in 1871, and he became loved by the people again. 

Harriet Mordaunt Locked Up, Charles Finally Gets His Divorce

Harriet paid a heavy price for her actions. She spent the rest of her life considered as a lunatic, locked away in discreet houses and asylums. When she died in May 1906 she was described as Sir Charles Mordaunt’s widow. This was an error; Charles obtained his divorce in 1875 because Viscount Lowry Cole admitted to his affair with Harriet.

Charles gave Violet an allowance but no attention. She was raised by the Moncrieffe family. Charles and Harriet Mordaunt were absent from Violet’s wedding to Thomas Thynne, Viscount Weymouth in April 1890. They later became the 5th Marquess and Marchioness of Bath. Charles passed away in October 1897 and Violet died in 1928, aged fifty nine.

Edward VII died on the 6th of May 1910 having ascended to the throne on the 22nd of January 1901.

8.4.25

The History Making Tolpuddle Martyrs

                                            Plaque dedicated to the Tolpuddle Martyrs. Credit Adam Bishop/Wikipedia CC4.0

Plaque dedicated to the Tolpuddle Martyrs. Image Credit: Adam Bishop/Wikipedia CC4.0.


 

The Tolpuddle Martyrs Were Ordinary Men 


The Tolpuddle Martyrs were six farm workers from Tolpuddle in Dorset, England that challenged the landowner Squire James Frampton and his managers about their poor working conditions and low wages.

The Tolpuddle Martyrs:

  • George Loveless.
  • James Loveless, brother of George Loveless.
  • John Standfield.
  • Thomas Standfield, father of John. Thomas was married Dinniah, nee Loveless, George and James' sister. The Standfield's and Lovelesses worked on the same farm.
  • James Brine. (He married Thomas Standfield's daughter Elizabeth).
  • James Hammett.

Barely able to cope on a wage of 9 shillings per week in 1830, the amount steadily decreased until in 1833 it was just 7 shillings per week with a 1 shilling reduction rumoured. That ensured starvation unless all the family (if there was one) were put to work. A tiny amount of flour, a peck, cost three shillings. (The Observer, 29th November 1830).

The martyrs story inspired the establishment of the earliest British trade unions tasked with protecting employees rights. Almost two hundred years later the men are still celebrated as ordinary people that changed lives forever, but at a devastating cost.


Fears Of An English Revolution

Agricultural labourers in other regions of England had already achieved a wage increase or a wage freeze by protesting, most notably in the 1830 Swing Riots.

In 1832 the six Tolpuddle men, none of them radicals or idealists, formed the Friendly Society of Agricultural Labourers, a small trade union funded by subscription fees. An oath of loyalty and secrecy was sworn as the inductee looked at an image of a skeleton, the symbol of mortality. They met in each others homes and under the village sycamore tree, later known as the Martyrs Tree.

The society members wanted wages of 10 shillings a week, still a meagre amount compared to the squire's wealth.

Frampton, in common with many establishment figures, was petrified of an English Revolution similar to the French one and so the existence of friendly societies (unions) was perceived as a threat and this motivated him to contact the Home Secretary William Lamb, Lord Melbourne (the future Prime Minister) to warn him about the dangers in his area.


The Tolpuddle Martyrs Trial

Melbourne was unswervingly against these societies and unions and he had a vested interest in Dorset because his brother-in-law William Ponsonby was the county's Member of Parliament.

He urged Frampton to employ spies and to enforce the 1797 Unlawful Oaths Act, the law that post French Revolution made the swearing of secret oaths illegal. The act was established to halt naval mutinies.

Frampton's spy and society member Edward Legg confirmed that a secret oath was sworn and the squire seized his opportunity to do his "duty". The six Tolpuddle society founders were arrested on the morning of 24th February 1834.

The following month they were tried at the Old Town Court in Dorchester. People realised that it was a grossly unfair trial. William Ponsonby M.P. was the head juror and the jury featured Squire Frampton, his son, his step-brother and several of the men who had signed the arrest warrants. Judge Williams was equally prejudiced against the defendants.


A Public Outcry

Judge Williams declared that the men were guilty; he claimed that "the safety of the country was at stake." He handed down the harshest sentence available to him: Transportation to Australia where each man would spend seven years in a penal colony. After their term was served, they faced the possibility of being sold into slavery because they wouldn't be able to afford their fare to travel home.

The press men in the court gallery ensured that news about the severity of the sentences spread quickly (by Georgian standards). There was outrage.

Other friendly societies rallied; they saw that they were just as vulnerable to unfair judgements. In the name of justice, unrest spread across the country and marches were organised. Petitions were signed by thousands.

The government and the landowners were stunned by the outcry but Lord Melbourne elected to do nothing to lessen or quash the Tolpuddle Martyrs convictions. Judge Williams was awarded a knighthood in April 1834.


A Pardon From King William IV

Five of the Tolpuddle Martyrs arrived in Sydney on 17th August 1834 and George Loveless reached Australia on 4th September 1834.

Their wives and families appealed for parish poor relief, money to help them to survive. Squire Frampton refused to assist them. The campaigners for justice for the Tolpuddle Martyrs came to their rescue.

By 1836 there had been a change in government and the sustained public outrage influenced the Home Secretary Lord John Russell, the future Prime Minister, to persuade King William IV to issue full pardons. The martyrs were finally free men, able to return to England but the news took months to reach Australia so their torment continued.

George Loveless was the first to arrive in England on 13th June 1837, a week before King William IV's death. Crowds of people were at the dock to see his homecoming. He hadn't seen his wife and children since the 24th February 1834.

The Standfields', Brine and James Loveless docked at Plymouth on 17th March 1838. They were gifted new suits and were taken to London for a celebratory dinner attended by 2,000 guests. James Hammett returned home on 25th August 1839.

George Loveless wrote about his experiences in "The Victims of Wiggery." Each copy cost 4 pence and the money went to the six men and their families. After their attempts to settle into new lives in Essex, England failed, five of the men and their families emigrated to Ontario, Canada to start afresh as farmers.

James Hammett stayed in Tolpuddle. He became a builder's labourer in Dorset and he was honoured by union leaders in 1875. He died in a workhouse in 1891; he didn't want to be a burden to his family, He was buried in Tolpuddle.

The annual Tolpuddle Martyrs Festival and Rally, organised by the Trades Union Congress celebrates their story. There are six memorial cottages, built in 1934, and a museum with a gift shop in the village.

The Tolpuddle Martyrs contribution to improving workers rights won't be forgotten.


Sources: